Closure and Telicity across Categories
نویسنده
چکیده
One of the fascinating aspects of telicity is its relations with non-verbal categories. Whether a given predicate is telic or atelic does not only depend on the verb, but can also be affected by the count/mass quantification in the NP object, by the lexical semantics of related adjectives, and by the prepositions that the predicate may contain. The latter two factors are in the focus of this paper. For example, the telicity of the deadjectival verb straighten and the complex verb phrase jump into the water, is related to the semantic structures of the adjective straight or the preposition into. A mathematical notion that is relevant to semantic domains across different categories is the notion of closed intervals – intervals that include their limit points. This paper studies the relations that closure properties of adjectives and prepositions bear to the (a)telicity properties of verb phrases. Following Rotstein and Winter (2004), closure of adjectival scales is treated as the defining distinction between two kinds of adjectives (e.g. straight vs. bent) that affects their behavior with almost modifiers. This leads to a conception of
منابع مشابه
Telicity and English Verb Classes and Alternations: an Overview
This document reports on research conducted for the University of Maryland Machine Translation (MT) project. The primary focus of this investigation concerns the lexical aspect feature [+telic] (i.e., having an inherent end, as in the verb win, vs. the verb run) and its relation to the alternations outlined in (Levin, 1993), English verb classes and alternations. This work is based on the assum...
متن کاملCategories isomorphic to the category of $L$-fuzzy closure system spaces
In this paper, new definitions of $L$-fuzzy closure operator, $L$-fuzzy interior operator, $L$-fuzzy remote neighborhood system, $L$-fuzzy neighborhood system and $L$-fuzzy quasi-coincident neighborhood system are proposed. It is proved that the category of $L$-fuzzy closure spaces, the category of $L$-fuzzy interior spaces, the category of $L$-fuzzy remote neighborhood spaces, the category of ...
متن کاملWhat is so difficult about telicity marking in L 2 Russian ? ∗
Two major mechanisms of encoding telicity across languages are either marking the object as exhaustively countable or measurable, or utilizing a specific prefix on the verbal form. English predominantly uses the first mechanism, while Russian mostly utilizes the second. The learning task of an English speaker acquiring Russian, then, is two-fold: to learn each individual verb with its subset of...
متن کاملCategories of lattice-valued closure (interior) operators and Alexandroff L-fuzzy topologies
Galois connection in category theory play an important role inestablish the relationships between different spatial structures. Inthis paper, we prove that there exist many interesting Galoisconnections between the category of Alexandroff $L$-fuzzytopological spaces, the category of reflexive $L$-fuzzyapproximation spaces and the category of Alexandroff $L$-fuzzyinterior (closure) spaces. This ...
متن کاملThe Telicity Parameter Revisited
The goals of this paper are threefold: First, to review some recent syntactic accounts of cross-linguistic differences in the expression of telicity in Slavic vs. Germanic languages. Second, I will argue that the parametric variation in the encoding of telicity cannot be based on a unidirectional specifier head agreement between the verbal functional head linked to the telicity of the VP and th...
متن کامل